Promotion of “Double Promotion” seminar on “Optimization and Promotion Scheme of Green Economy Evaluation System in Pu ‘er City”
Citation: Feng Lu. Seminar on “Optimization and Improvement Scheme of Green Economy Evaluation System in Pu ‘er City”, promoting the “double improvement” of Green economy evaluation and GEP accounting in Pu ‘er City.Biodiversity conservation and green development.Hundred. February 16, 2022.Abstract: Under issn2749-9065, the symposium “Optimization and Improvement Scheme of Green Economy evaluation System in Pu ‘er City” focuses on the double optimization and improvement of Green economy evaluation system and GEP accounting index in Pu ‘er City, aiming to form a scientific evaluation index system suitable for high-quality development of Pu ‘er City.On December 31, 2021, The China Biodiversity Conservation and Green Development Foundation (CFDA) organized and held the seminar of “Optimization and Improvement Scheme of Green Economy Evaluation System in Pu ‘er City”.The meeting focused on the optimization of green economy evaluation system of Pu ‘er city and how to realize its scientific integration with GEP index system for detailed communication and discussion.China green hair; deputy director and secretary-general Zhou Jinfeng, China green hair, vice President of the Beijing institute of shan-long lu, director of the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) macroeconomic research institute chun-ping Yang, national school of administration jiang-tao li, professor, professor Wang Ru, ecological research center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, hanbo lonpos, National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), pu, director of the institute of land development and regional economic sasihorfswe, deputy director of the municipal development and reform commission (NDRC), the city greenColor economy director Feng Yu Jun and other related personnel attended the meeting.At the beginning of the meeting, Lu Shanlong, vice president of Green Society Beijing Research Institute, made a comprehensive introduction to the origin of green economy evaluation system in Pu ‘er city, the development of GEP accounting, and the existing problems in practical operation, and put forward practical problems such as how to optimize and improve the two indicator systems, whether they should be integrated and how to integrate.Professor jiang-tao li pu ‘er city is introduced at the beginning of the evaluation system of green economy, the index set and operational aspects of reasons, and said the GEP on ecological value, also is the output value of the ecosystem, is the green economy evaluation system of ecological system of value-added part of the expansion and improvement of but essentially there exist certain difference.After listening to the detailed introduction, Yang Chunping, director of the green economy evaluation system and GEP are two sets of logic system, whether it can be integrated is a scientific issue, should not simply put together;Secondly, he also pointed out that the green economy evaluation system needs to improve the details.Dr. Han Baolong focused on the development and application of GEP accounting in Shenzhen and Lishui, Zhejiang province. He said that GEP accounting can clearly quantify the value of ecological products, so as to better implement the concept of “clear water and green mountains are gold and silver mountains”, but it focuses on the realization of the value of ecological products, rather than economic assessment.Director Li Zhong stressed that the evaluation system of green economy needs to be sorted out, and the theory and indicators should be improved and improved with The Times.Professor Wang Ru thinks that we should pay attention to the restrictive indicators mentioned in the “fourteenth Five-year Plan”, and the operation of the index system must be through.The relevant person in charge of The Green Economy Office of Pu ‘er city analyzed a series of problems existing in the actual operation of the green economy evaluation system and GEP accounting in the government units of Pu ‘er City, and expressed the hope that after the optimization and improvement of the evaluation system, the setting of indicators will be more scientific, reasonable and simple, with strong operability and wide applicability.The experts at the meeting had a heated discussion on whether the green economy evaluation system and GEP system of Pu ‘er city should coexist independently, be optimized and improved separately, or be scientifically integrated and optimized.On the one hand, green economy evaluation system and GEP are relatively independent. Green economy evaluation system reflects economic value-added, while GEP accounting emphasizes ecological output value, which cannot be simply and directly integrated.Evaluation system of green economy and GEP, on the other hand, both have plenty of room to improve, with the development of new ideas, new ideas, new requirements, dealing with the parts of the existing evaluation system of green economy index appropriate trade-off, change numerous for brief, and consider into carbon sinks, green technology innovation, and biological diversity index is suitable for the present development,GEP accounting can serve and be applied to ecological compensation system, ecological protection and restoration identification, ecological protection red line supervision, ecological protection performance assessment, etc.At the end of the meeting, all the experts agreed that Pu ‘er Should first define the management needs and purposes of its application of the index evaluation system, which should be mainly economic construction or green water and green mountains. While optimizing and improving the application of the green economy evaluation system, pu ‘er should keep pace with The Times and improve and implement the new development concept and pattern.Form a set of scientific assessment index system suitable for high-quality development of Pu ‘er City.